English Language Arts/Literacy Standards Review

Banner

English Language Arts (ELA) learning begins long before formal schooling with the development of literacy skills that are biological as well as social. Development of strong ELA/literacy skills is essential because literacy is the foundation for learning across disciplines and for effective communication. The ELA/literacy standards begin at kindergarten with developmentally appropriate reading, writing, listening, and speaking skills articulated as three separate strands but intended to be taught, practiced, and assessed as integrally related. A fourth strand, Language, presents the functional aspect of language development with grammar, usage, mechanics, and vocabulary development. Language standards must be connected to the other strands to better understand the increasingly complex demands of the standards as they develop across the K-12 grade span.

Looking for instructional support? Visit the ELA Standards Instruction Resources page, and check out the Maine Literacy Hub for literacy resources, professional learning, and more!

Review Cycles

Select a year to view the details of each English language arts standards review cycle, including timelines, team members, and public comments.

English Language Arts Review 2019

This review produced the 2020 Maine ELA standards, available for download below.

Writing Team Members
First Name Last Name School County
Seth Anderson Lincoln Academy Lincoln
Lindsey Baillie Ellsworth High School Hancock
Edith Berger Miller School Lincoln
Jennifer Bernhardt Ellsworth High School Hancock
Melissa Biehn Hermon Middle & High School Penobscot
Melanie Brown Ellsworth Elementary School Hancock
Donald Chouinard Fort Kent Community High School Aroostook
Karole Clark Molly Ockett School Oxford
Michelle DeBlois Lewiston Middle School Androscoggin
Andrew DeMaris Bonny Eagle Middle School York
Sara Derosby Longley Elementary Androscoggin
Wendy Dunbar Mt. Jefferson Jr. High School Penobscot
Heather Ford Hancock County Technical Center Hancock
Jane Gamage Noble High School York
Kirsten Gould Buxton Center Elementary School York
Liz Guillemette Maranacook Community High School Kennebec
Stefani Gundel Oceanside High School Knox
Joanne Hajduk Martel Elementary Androscoggin
Phyllis Harmon Mountain View School Hancock
Linda Haskell Messalonskee Middle School Kennebec
Stephanie Hendrix Bangor High School Penobscot
Hillary Hoyt Leroy Smith School Waldo
Penny Inman Helen Thompson School Kennebec
Lori Johnston Ellsworth Elementary School Hancock
Kathy Kauffman Oak Hill Middle School Androscoggin
Lisa Kelley Nokomis Regional High School Penobscot
Lianne Lander Strong Elementary Franklin
Andrea Logan Lyman Moore Middle School Cumberland
Ruth Miller Massabesic Middle School York
Donna Munro Union Elementary School Knox
Janet Murakami Houlton Elementary and Middle School Aroostook
Kathryn Naude Belfast Area High School Waldo
Susannah Owen Bangor High School Penobscot
Melissa Poston Telstar Regional High School Oxford
Laurence Reinhartsen Saco Middle School York
Neal Rioux Leavitt Area High School Androscoggin
Amber Russo Scarborough High School Cumberland
Carissa Sawyer Maine Central Institute Somerset
Kristen Shaw Brewer Community School Penobscot
Kim Simpson Poland Community School Androscoggin
April Spencer Windsor Elementary School Kennebec
Dannietta Storer Captain Albert Stevens Elementary Waldo
Catherine Stubbs Oak Hill High School Androscoggin
Justin Stygles Wiscasset Elementary School Lincoln
Christine Suver Medomak Middle School Lincoln
Holly Tupper Messalonskee Middle School Kennebec
Megan Wedge China Middle School Kennebec
Steering Committee Guidance to the Writing Team

Guidance from ELA Steering Committee to ELA Writing Committee

Overall:

  • Keep the big picture in mind: students at the center.
  • Reduce the total number of standards by combining like topics.
  • Ensure consistent developmentally appropriate progressions.
  • Students are critical consumers and producers of technology. Account for (reflect) how technology and digital tools in the 21st century impact literacy development.
  • Ensure the use of teacher-friendly language.
  • The ELA standards develop skills in the English language with an awareness of the cultural responsiveness of other languages.

Introduction:

  • State that literacy is a developmental process and continuum that values all learners.
  • Make statements about lifelong learning rather than college and career ready.
  • Include the Guiding Principles in the introduction using the Social Studies model. Examples may be broader due to the nature of ELA as a content area.
  • Address the updated form and format of the standards.
  • Address the importance of literature and the balance of text types with attention to a variety of text types.
  • Slim down the introduction by adding a preamble to each strand that clarifies instructional topics and terms.

Strand A – Reading:

The preamble should include:

  • Expanded definition of "text."
  • Definition of print: includes the ability to read various texts such as print, cursive, and common digital fonts.
  • Definition of fluency.
  • A balance of instructional approaches and possibilities.
  • Explanation of the philosophical importance of phonics.
  • Explanation of text complexity with quantitative, qualitative, and reader & task elements, mentioning that these are further explained in supporting documents.
  • Explanation of range of reading text types and text complexity (current standard #10).

The standards:

  • Reconsider the list format of the foundational skills so as not to be seen as a list.
  • Maintain headings (Foundational Skills, Key Ideas & Details, Craft & Structure, Integration of Knowledge & Ideas).
  • Apply the broader definition of text (provided in the preamble) throughout the reading standards to include digital literacy.
  • Keep, expand, or highlight connections to disciplinary literacy (especially in K-5 standards).
  • Remove examples that suggest curriculum or specific texts.
  • Remove the wording "by the end of the year" when the standard is a span and not a single grade.
  • Blend or integrate inquiry and research information found in writing standards 7-9 into the reading standards and into writing standards 1-3 for Text Types and Purposes.

Strand B – Writing:

The preamble should expand:

  • Text types
  • Composing
  • Forms of writing (print, cursive, keyboarding, font, etc.)
  • Range of writing: writing standard 10 should be part of the preamble introduction to the writing section.
  • Use language that is more inclusive of all learners – including EL Learners and various levels.

The standards:

  • Reframe the content of the first three standards, Text Types & Purposes, from exclusive types – expository, argumentative and narrative.
    • Focus on audience, purpose, genre, and mode rather than the prescriptive types of writing in standards 1-3.
    • Include blended writing.
  • Keep a process that includes collaboration, reflection, revision, and editing; change "Production and Distribution of Writing" to "Process & Production of Writing."
  • Include K-2 in the Process & Production of Writing.
  • Keep, expand, or highlight connections to disciplinary literacy (especially in K-5 standards).
  • Consider the implications of current, 21st-century technology, including digital composition.
  • Blend or integrate inquiry and research information in writing standards 7-9 into the reading standards and writing standards 1-3 for Text Types and Purposes.

Strand C – Speaking and Listening:

The preamble should include:

  • Speaking and listening may include digital modes and media considerations
  • Terms that reflect modern terminology and technology
  • Specifics of discourse, audience and purpose.

Strand D – Language:

The preamble should include:

  • Importance of integrated instruction of language standards into reading, writing, speaking & listening.
  • An expectation that the language standards will be taught and assessed as an embedded component of the other strands except where direct instruction is necessary.
  • Explanation that language development is approached through integration into other strands rather than a discrete list of skills.
  • The balance between integration and the skills we really want to be taught.

The standards:

  • Review the use of "standard English" as a phrase (consider language appropriate and responsive to the task, purpose, and audience at hand).
  • Reconsider the use of the word "command."
  • Reconsider the use of the word formal.
  • Integrate or reflect language with the reading and writing standards.
  • Reorganize standards 1-3 into three categories: as they apply to reading, as they apply to writing, and as they apply to speaking and listening.
  • Add K-1 standards to Knowledge of Language.
  • Consider combining standards 4 and 5, or consolidating 4-6 into one standard, aligning to or embedded within reading, writing, speaking & listening, or having vocabulary stand alone in the other content strands.
Steering Committee Work Session Summary

February 28, 2019

  • The committee began developing an understanding of the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) protocol by working through the introduction to ELA standards.
  • The committee reviewed reading standards 1, 2, and 3.
  • Concerns were voiced about the purpose and structure of the Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science and Technical Subjects standards. After vigorous discussion, the committee agreed to table the discussion, review the updated science and social studies standards for homework, and come to the next session prepared to make a recommendation about how to address the content literacy standards.

March 19, 2019

  • Complete the SWOT for all reading standards
  • A proposal was made for addressing the literacy standards

May 24, 2019

  • The entire team convened
  • The committee completed the SWOT process for the reading foundational skills standards and the writing standards.
  • Review the foundational skills standards and determine their role in the revision process
  • The speaking and listening standards were completed in the SWOT process

May 29, 2019

  • Complete SWOT for Language Standards
  • Consider the Guiding Principles and determine how to address these in ELA
  • Review public comment submitted
  • Respond to instructions from Ed Committee regarding cursive writing
  • 2014 Validation report
  • Final recommendation for handling or addressing disciplinary literacy
  • Craft guidance
Steering Committee Members

Andrea Stairs-Davenport, PhD is associate professor and chair of the Literacy, Language, and Culture department at the University of Southern Maine. Dr. Stairs-Davenport teaches graduate courses in literacy development, English as a second language, and research methods and serves as Site Director of the Southern Maine Writing Project. A former middle and high school English language arts teacher and literacy coach, she earned her BA in English and secondary teacher certification from Colby College and her master's and doctoral degrees from Boston College.

Beth Carlson is an English teacher and Department Chair at Kennebunk High School (RSU 21). Currently, Ms. Carlson teaches 11th and 12th grade, including college preparatory, Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, and SMCC 100 Dual Enrollment courses. Prior to this, she taught English and history to at-risk students in Maine and to middle school students in Maine and Massachusetts. Ms. Carlson is Past President and Board member in the Maine Council for English Language Arts. She earned her BFA in Creative Writing with minors in Elementary Education and Psychology from Roger Williams University and an M.Ed. in Adolescent Education from Lesley College.

Cristina Perez Zamora teaches ESL at MSAD #37 (Harrington). She graduated from the University of Maine at Orono in May 2017 where she majored in Elementary Education with a concentration in ESL (English as a Second Language). Ms. Zamora works with students from Pre-K to grade 12. "I am honored to be part of the ELA Steering Committee. I hope that together we can provide a better education for the students."

Dawn Moore is in her ninth year as principal of the Leroy H. Smith School in Winterport, Me. (RSU #22) where she is also the district Pre-K Coordinator. With 27 years of prior education work, Ms. Moore has served as a teaching principal, interim principal and lower elementary classroom teacher. She holds a B.S. in Elementary Education from the University of Southern Maine as well as an M.S. in General Education and a C.A.S. in Educational Leadership from the University of New England. Ms. Moore received the honor of being named Maine's NAESP 2018 Principal of the Year.

Heather Manchester is the Curriculum Director for MSAD #17, serving the eight towns of the Oxford Hills since 2014. Prior to this, she started her career in London, England, as an English teacher in a large comprehensive school. Upon returning to Maine, she eventually landed at Poland Regional High School for fifteen years, where she taught English and served as the school's instructional coach. Heather earned her BA at Wheaton College in Norton, Massachusetts, her Post Graduate Certificate of Education at the University of London Institute of Education, and her Master's Degree from Lesley University. Ms. Manchester currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Maine Curriculum Leaders Association.

James Isgro is a retired technology specialist with a telecommunication national engineering staff. He has also had careers in Law Enforcement and Data Project Management. He is a part time consultant and remains active in education and technology. Jim is a veteran of the US Navy, US Army Reserve and SC State Guard. He currently serves as Chair on the Board of Directors for Maine Regional School Unit 18.

Lane W. Clarke, Ed.D. is an Associate Professor of Education at University of New England. She teaches classes at the undergraduate level to pre-service teachers in literacy and global education. She earned a B.A. in Psychology at Dickinson College, an M.S.Ed. at Rowan University, and an Ed.D. in Literacy from University of Cincinnati. Prior to joining University of New England, Dr. Clarke taught literacy courses at Northern Kentucky University, was a reading specialist in Cincinnati, Ohio and a fourth grade teacher in Rochester, New York and Williamston, South Carolina. She has published three books and has articles published in journals such as The Reading Teacher, Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, Journal of Literacy Research, English Journal, and Language Arts among others.

Lisa Sockabasin is a public health and health systems consultant for Public Health Research Institute (PHRI), the Penobscot Indian Nation, and the Maine Tribal Public Health District. She has health policy and planning expertise and experience in tribal, state, and federal governments, non-profits, and the philanthropic sector. Lisa previously worked in the philanthropic sector and served as the Director of the Office of Health Equity, Maine Department of Health and Human Services for 10 years from 2005-2016. She is a graduate of the University of Maine with a B.S. in Nursing and a B.S. in Biology and the University of Southern Maine with a M.S. in Health Policy and Management and a graduate certificate in non-profit management and strategic planning. Lisa is a Passamaquoddy tribal member, one of four federally recognized Indian Tribes in Maine.

Peter Lancia, Ph.D. serves as Superintendent of Schools in Westbrook, Maine. He has taught in the Westbrook School Department since 1990 serving as a second grade teacher, literacy specialist, elementary school principal, Director of Teaching and Learning, and Assistant Superintendent. He also teaches graduate courses in Literacy Education at the University of Southern Maine, coordinates the Southern Maine Literacy Leaders Network, and is past-President of Maine ASCD. He earned his BA at Bowdoin College, his M.S.Ed. in Literacy Education at USM, and his Ph.D. in Adult Learning and Development at Lesley University. Dr. Lancia was honored as 2002 Maine Teacher of the Year and 2016 Maine Curriculum Leader of the Year.

Ryan Dippre is in his fourth year at the University of Maine. He is a graduate of Wilkes University (B.A., M.S.) and the University of California, Santa Barbara (M.A., Ph.D.). His scholarship focuses on writing development; particularly, he is interested in how and why (1) writing development is shaped by participants, both philosophically and technologically; and (2) writers develop both on a moment-to-moment basis and over time. While his recent work has focused on writing development across the K-16 continuum, he is interested in how writers develop across the lifespan.

Public Comment
  • Sylvia, Danielle – (PDF)
  • Laughlin, Linda – (PDF)
  • Bickford, Lindsey – (PDF)
  • Leamon, Rebecca – (PDF)
  • Lambert, Jason – (PDF)
  • Rhoads, Kyle – (PDF)
  • McGinley, Heidi – (PDF)
  • Murphy, Dan – (PDF)
  • Dippre, Ryan J. – (PDF)
  • Baillie, Lindsey – (PDF)

English Language Arts Review 2025

The next review of the English language arts standards is scheduled for 2025. Details, timelines, and opportunities for public comment will be posted here as the review begins.

English Language Arts Review 2030

A review of the English language arts standards is scheduled for 2030. Details will be posted here as the review approaches.

The 2020 Maine ELA Standards

Implementing Maine's Updated English Language Arts Standards

The Maine ELA standards have been updated. Understand what has changed, why they have changed, and how these changes can impact your practice.

At the Beginning: Introduction to the Updated Maine ELA Standards
  • Watch the video
  • Review the PPT slides
  • Read and annotate the ELA Intro & Preambles
    • Highlight what is consistent with your current practice and beliefs;
    • Underline what contradicts or is absent from your current practice.
    • Discuss or journal: What did you highlight and underline? What are the implications for your school/district?
Revisions: Some, None, & Significant
The Deep Dive: Preparing to Implement the Updated Standards
  • Watch the video
  • Study the performance indicators for the standards you grouped.
    • What has come before?
    • What comes after?

Updated Standards by Topic

Language Standards

The Language strand provides learning targets in developmental progressions for each grade K-5. The standards then move to multi-grade spans in grades 6-8 and 9-12.

Essential Topics in ELA

The language standards are first in the 2020 ELA document because they provide a starting point for selecting text, planning instruction, and supporting literacy growth with transferable skills.

Close Reading: How Does the Text Work?

This professional learning event focuses on the role of language standards using a text-dependent technique featured in the Fisher et al. text Text-Dependent Questions: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading (K-5 and 6-12). Consider what to look for when selecting a text, how to prioritize passages for whole-class study, and the role that language standards play in style, tone, and complexity.

Slides | Session recording 10.7.2021

Resources to support the language standards

Professional Texts

  • Douglas, et al. Text-Dependent Questions, Grades 6-12: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading (Corwin Literacy). Corwin.
  • Douglas, et al. Text-Dependent Questions, Grades K-5: Pathways to Close and Critical Reading (Corwin Literacy). Corwin.
  • Lab, Purdue Writing. "OWL // Purdue Writing Lab." Purdue Writing Lab, https://owl.purdue.edu/. Accessed 6 Oct. 2021.

Other

  • Conventions and Knowledge of Language. From Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards, explains development and implementation of the language standards.
  • Vocabulary. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards explains that vocabulary development is more than just memorizing word lists.
  • Bibliography. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides the research and reference foundation that informed the development of the language standards.
Writing Standards

The Writing strand provides learning targets in developmental progressions for each grade K-5. The standards then move to multi-grade spans in grades 6-8 and 9-12.

Information to support understanding and implementation of the writing standards

  • Text Types and Purposes. Modes of writing, or text types, has been moved out of rule (Maine's Learning Results). Details about text types and purposes may still be helpful for curriculum development and instructional planning, but these modes of writing will not inform accountability and assessment.
  • Bibliography. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides the research and reference foundation that informed the development of the writing standards.
  • Evidence-Based Responses. Evidence-based responses support claims with evidence from various sources, including texts – print and digital – listening, viewing, and observing.
  • Join Morgan Dunton and Neal Rioux to take a deep dive into the updated standards with a focus on how to implement the streamlined writing standards: Slides | Recording
Speaking & Listening Standards

The Speaking and Listening strand provides learning targets in developmental progressions for each grade K-5. The standards then move to multi-grade spans in grades 6-8 and 9-12.

Resources to support the speaking and listening standards

  • The Role of Speaking and Listening. From Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards.
  • Bibliography. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides the research and reference foundation that informed the development of the speaking and listening standards.
Reading Standards

The Reading strand provides learning targets in developmental progressions for each grade K-5. The standards then move to multi-grade spans in grades 6-8 and 9-12.

Supporting materials to better implement the reading standards

  • Text Complexity. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides an explanation of the three components of text complexity.
  • Reading Foundational Skills. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards, a description of the role of foundational skills and an explanation of the components.
  • Bibliography. Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards provides the research and reference foundation that informed the development of the reading standards.
  • Appendix B of the Common Core State Standards. Text exemplars to demonstrate grade-level complexity; sample performance tasks aligned to standards and grade-level texts.
  • Text Complexity Resources. Tools to support analyzing complexity. Resources to inform professional learning.
  • Close Reading/Text-Dependent Questions. Close reading strategies help students develop a deep understanding of a text.

The Standards Review Process

The Maine Department of Education (DOE) conducts a scheduled, periodic review of the Maine Learning Results in each content area. Every review follows the same sequence of steps:

Step Time Period Details
Step 1 Fall Commissioner gives the approval to begin the standards review process
Step 2 Fall Public comment period and hearings on current content standards
Step 3 Winter

Steering Committee: A committee of content area experts who represent the cultural diversity found in Maine and a range of viewpoints as to the content of the standards is formed and tasked to:

  • Review all comments submitted during the initial public comment period;
  • Develop a blueprint for the revision of the state standards in their assigned content area;
  • Address and advise the writing committees when deadlocks occur.

The Maine State Board of Education will appoint one member of the Steering Committee.

Step 4 Winter Maine DOE review and approval of the steering committee's recommended blueprint for standards revision
Step 5 Summer Writing Team: Teams of PK-12 public school teachers who represent Maine's cultural and geographical diversity are formed and broken into smaller groups, facilitated by the Maine DOE content specialist, to revise content standards based on guidance from the Steering Committee.
Step 6 Summer The Writing Team submits draft proposal to the Maine Department of Education.
Step 7 Fall Internal Maine DOE review of standards revision
Step 8 Fall The Maine DOE files the standards revision document as proposed rules with the Secretary of State.
Step 9 Fall Maine DOE will hold a public hearing followed by a public comment period on the proposed rules.
Step 10 Winter Maine DOE prepares and submits provisional adoption of standards revision to the Secretary of State and Legislative Council. The Legislature, once in session in January, will refer the rule as a legislative document to the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee where they will be given an LD Resolve to revise during session.
Step 11 Winter The Education and Cultural Affairs Committee will hold a public hearing and work session before sending the proposed rules on to the full legislature.
Step 12 Spring Final adoption of revised standards by the Maine State Legislature.
Step 13 Spring The Maine Department of Education will prepare the standards regulation for final adoption